More Musings

๐Ÿ“Š Windows Server 2025: Essentials vs. Standard โ€” My Business-Focused Comparison

A note:

Two Different Standards at Play

Standard What It Means Applies To
UK/EU Licensing Law Youโ€™re allowed to resell and reuse perpetual software licences under specific conditions (e.g. UsedSoft ruling) Resellers offering reused OEM/Volume licences
Microsoft-Supported Microsoft will recognise, activate, and provide support or escalation for your licence Only applies to new, genuine licences from Microsoft-authorised channels

I have here compared both Windows Server 2025 Essentials with Standard Edition for a business, with a key priority: allowing external users to connect via Remote Desktop (RDP) without excessive licensing complexity or cost.

Below is I hope my clear breakdown of the licensing model and technical feature differences between the two editions โ€” along with a recommendation based on the day to day needs.

Note a CAL is a Client Access Licence and an RD Cal is a Remote Desktop Client Access Licence.

๐Ÿงพ Licensing & Usage Comparison

Feature Essentials Standard
User/Device Limit Up to 25 users and 50 devices No inherent limit; requires CALs for each user or device
Client Access Licenses Not required Required for each user or device accessing the server
Licensing Model Per server Core-based (minimum of 16 cores per server)
Remote Desktop Services Limited to 2 simultaneous sessions for admin only; RDS CALs not supported. DEAL-BREAKER Fully supports Remote Desktop Services with RDS CALs – So you have to have both CALS and RD CALS
Virtualization Rights No virtualization rights included Includes rights for 2 VMs and 1 Hyper-V host per license
Installation Options OEM only Available via multiple channels

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Technical Feature Comparison

Feature Essentials Standard
Active Directory Domain Services Supported Supported
Hyper-V Not supported Supported
Storage Spaces Direct Not supported Not supported (Datacenter only)
Shielded Virtual Machines Not supported Not supported (Datacenter only)
Software-Defined Networking Not supported Not supported (Datacenter only)
Windows Admin Center Supported Supported
Hotpatching Not supported Supported –USEFUL

๐Ÿ’ก My Conclusion

After comparing both editions, hereโ€™s what I conclude:

  • Remote Desktop Access: Essentials only permits two concurrent admin sessions and explicitly does not support RDS CALs. That makes it unsuitable as we need more than two users accessing the server via RDP at the same time, probably around 5.
  • Avoiding CALs: Essentials looks attractive because it avoids CALs altogether โ€” but that comes at the cost of RDP limitations and other technical restrictions.
  • Standard Edition: Standard requires CALs and gives the flexibility to deploy Remote Desktop Services, to scale RDP sessions, and support a growing environment without artificial caps.

๐Ÿ”ฅ Why Essentials Was a Dealbreaker for me

Essentials has a critical limitation:

๐Ÿšซ It does not support Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) โ€” legally or technically.

That means:

  • โŒ No full RDP hosting
  • โŒ No RDS CALs can be added later
  • โŒ You’re locked at two admin-only connections โ€” always

For a small team or limited internal use, that could be acceptable. But for external access and proper RDP use, it’s not viable.

โœ… Why I select Standard Edition

I chOose Windows Server 2025 Standard because it:

  • โœ… Fully supports Remote Desktop Services
  • โœ… Scales with needs (just add RDS CALs)
  • โœ… Avoids the โ€œhard capโ€ problem of Essentials
  • โœ… Comes with 2 VM rights, giving us flexible deployment options, this is more important than at first apparent.

And importantly:

  • One can buy only the RDS CALs we need, either per-user or per-device – and for example the Shop machine might have device (RD) CALS whereas individuals have their own.

โœ… Summary: Essentials is only viable ifโ€ฆ

  • You’re a very small office (under 25 users)

– You only need 1โ€“2 admin-only RDP sessions

– Youโ€™re happy with strict limitations and no RDS expansion

Otherwise, the flexibility and scalability of Windows Server 2025 Standard far outweigh the additional licensing costs โ€” and thatโ€™s why I choose it; frankly I don’t see a choice.